SolidGigs
Cost: 14-day free trial, then $35/month or $350/year.
Model: curated external opportunities.
Choose SolidGigs when you want predictable fixed-cost external opportunity curation. Choose Designhill when design contests and 1-to-1 projects fit how you win design work.
AlreadyChecked Verdict
SolidGigs fits freelancers who want broad external opportunity curation at a predictable fixed recurring cost. Designhill fits designers who specifically value contests and 1-to-1 projects enough to manage competition, handover, payout timing and subscription-option-dependent commission rules.
| Choice | Best for | Current cost | Biggest advantage | Important limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed curation SolidGigs | Freelancers who want broad curated external opportunities and already manage their own client workflow. | $35/month or $350/year after a 14-day free trial. | Predictable recurring acquisition cost. | No leads, clients or earnings are guaranteed; downstream client transactions remain outside the curation layer. |
| Design marketplace Designhill | Designers who want contests and 1-to-1 projects as a design-specific acquisition path. | Contest entry can be free. Current Terms provide for annual designer subscription charges and commission that varies with the subscription option; the checked logged-out public material does not establish one reliable universal designer percentage or annual price. | Design-specific contest and direct-project workflow with upfront contest funding and platform payout mechanisms. | Free entry does not guarantee compensation, guaranteed contests do not pay every entrant, payout is not instant, and the public fee evidence does not support one universal designer commission. |
Checked September 5, 2026. This receipt summarizes evidence already present on this page; it is not an A✓/CHECKED automated-verification badge.
No universal winner. Contest entry can be free on Designhill, but that does not make earning fee-free or guaranteed. Current Terms provide for designer subscription charges and commission that can depend on the subscription option; we found no reliable logged-out current source proving one universal designer commission percentage.
Trust boundary: This is a manually researched editorial comparison. It is not an A✓/CHECKED automated verification record and carries no A✓/CHECKED approval badge. This support page contains no direct merchant affiliate destination.
Cost: 14-day free trial, then $35/month or $350/year.
Model: curated external opportunities.
Entry: designers can enter contests for free.
Model: design contests plus 1-to-1 projects.
Fee boundary: current Terms provide for annual designer subscription charges and variable commission depending on subscription option; no flat current percentage is asserted here.
Designhill currently says designers can enter contests for free. But contests are competitive. A designer is paid when they win or otherwise qualify for payment under the applicable project/contest rules. Free entry does not guarantee selection, work or earnings.
Current Designhill Terms say designer registration can carry an annual subscription charge and that Designhill retains commission from design-payment flows, with commission depending on the designer’s chosen subscription option. The current logged-out public material we reviewed does not expose one reliable universal designer commission percentage or one universal annual designer-subscription price, so this page does not manufacture either figure.
Current help says the contest holder pays the contest amount upfront before launch. Contests can be refundable or guaranteed. A guaranteed contest is non-refundable to the customer and commits the prize budget to a winner/distribution outcome under the current rules; it does not mean every entrant gets paid.
After selection, the winning designer uploads the required final/source files and completes handover. Current help describes a 14-day handover and automatic-release language when the client does not close the handover, but a more specific nonpayment article narrows the explicit assurance to guaranteed contests. We therefore do not represent 14 days as an unconditional universal payout SLA.
Current payout help lists PayPal or Payoneer, a $50 minimum payout request, and a stated 3-day review period after money reaches the Designhill e-wallet before withdrawal request. After a withdrawal request, current guidance says transfer processing can take 48 hours to 10 working days. That processing window is not a guaranteed final bank-arrival time.
Current 1-to-1 help distinguishes Pay and Hold—the default mode that holds payment until work is finished and the client releases funds—from Pay Now, which releases funds to the designer immediately. They do not have identical timing or protection.
Current Designhill 1-to-1 guidance says clients pay a 5% payment-processing fee on top of invoiced amounts. That is a client-side processing fee and is not evidence of a 5% designer commission.
For a winning contest design, copyright/ownership and required source files transfer through the handover/Design Transfer Agreement process. A nonwinning design does not automatically transfer to the customer merely because it was submitted.
SolidGigs fits better when you already manage your own client workflow and need curated external leads.
Designhill fits better when design-specific marketplace workflow is worth the contest competition, handover, commission/subscription and payout rules.
Designhill contest entry is a weak fit for that expectation. Free entry and guaranteed contests do not mean every entrant receives compensation.
Do not infer one from this public research. Current Terms make commission subscription-option dependent, and the logged-out material reviewed did not expose one reliable universal percentage.
SolidGigs fit? Our complete SolidGigs review contains the governed commercial handoff.
Publication status: Last checked September 5, 2026. Refresh due October 5, 2026. Designhill contest, subscription, commission and payout rules can change. Production deployment remains separately unproven under issue #369.