Freelance lead comparison · Last checked September 5, 2026 · Refresh due October 5, 2026

SolidGigs vs A.Team: broad lead discovery or selective senior tech missions?

Choose SolidGigs when your bottleneck is finding external freelance opportunities and you prefer to control pitching, contracts and payment yourself. Choose A.Team when you are a senior technical or product builder willing to pass selective vetting and prefer private-network missions plus platform-managed contracts, invoicing, collection and payments.

AlreadyChecked Verdict

No universal winner: choose broad independent lead discovery or selective senior-tech missions with managed commercial administration.

SolidGigs fits freelancers who want broad external opportunity discovery and downstream independence. A.Team fits senior technical/product builders willing to pass selective vetting who value private-network missions plus platform-managed contracts, invoicing, collection and payments.

Best for you if… you value private-network mission access enough to accept selective admission, mission-specific service orders and relationship restrictions rather than owning the entire downstream client workflow.
ChoiceBest forCurrent costBiggest advantageImportant limitation
Broad discovery
SolidGigs
Freelancers who want broader external opportunities and independent client relationships.$35/month or $350/year after a 14-day free trial.Predictable fixed-cost discovery across multiple external sources.No leads, clients, missions, hours or earnings are guaranteed.
Senior tech missions
A.Team
Senior engineering, AI, product, design and related technical builders who can pass selective vetting.A.Team says builders set their rate and it does not skim fees from that builder rate; client-side all-in pricing and markup are separate.Private mission network plus managed contracts, invoicing, collection and payments.Acceptance and matching are not guaranteed; Net-15 language is provider-controlled; mission terms can be set by separate service orders; 24-month non-circumvention can apply.

Research receipt

SolidGigs price/model checked
A.Team selectivity bounded
Builder-rate boundary checked
Net-15 promise bounded
Mission/service-order terms checked
Non-circumvention/network fee checked

Checked September 5, 2026. This receipt summarizes evidence already present on this page; it is not an A✓/CHECKED automated-verification badge.

Rate boundary: A.Team currently says builders set their rate and it does not skim fees from that builder rate. That does not mean a builder receives 100% of every client-facing dollar; client-side all-in pricing and platform markup are separate.

Trust boundary: This is a manually researched editorial comparison. It is not an A✓/CHECKED automated verification record and carries no A✓/CHECKED approval badge. This support page contains no direct merchant affiliate destination.

Current models

SolidGigs

Cost: 14-day free trial, then $35/month or $350/year.

Model: broader multi-source external lead curation for discovering freelance opportunities.

A.Team

Access: selective network for senior engineering, AI, product, design and related technical builders.

Workflow: vetted builders can apply to missions; A.Team/client selection follows, with platform contracts, invoicing, collection and payment administration.

Fewer than 2% accepted is a provider claim, not an AlreadyChecked badge

A.Team's current Join page says fewer than 2% of applicants are accepted and describes evaluation across technical depth, communication, portfolio, panel review and culture fit. We treat that percentage as provider-reported selectivity—not independent proof of quality, safety, placement odds, or A✓/CHECKED authority.

A.Team does not guarantee a match

Accepted builders can apply to missions, but A.Team's current platform Terms explicitly state that the platform does not guarantee any match. Client interview and selection authority still matter. Acceptance into the network therefore does not guarantee mission availability, an interview, client selection, project start, hours, duration or earnings.

No fee skim from your rate is not the same as the client invoice

A.Team says builders set their rate and that it does not skim fees from that builder rate. We report that current provider statement as written. We do not turn it into a claim that the builder receives 100% of every client-facing dollar, because client-facing all-in pricing and platform markup are separate commercial terms.

Payment is provider-stated twice monthly on Net-15

Current A.Team builder material says builders are paid twice monthly on a Net-15 cycle and uses guaranteed-on-time-payment language. We treat that as A.Team's own payment promise—not an unconditional AlreadyChecked guarantee across every service order, account, compliance, dispute, termination, fraud, banking or other scenario not established by public evidence.

The actual mission can be controlled by a separate service order

A.Team's current platform Terms say that when a Builder and Client proceed, the Builder and A-Teams enter a separate Builder Service Order specifying fees, anticipated project length and other material terms. Separate Builder Development Services Terms can govern the actual development engagement and prevail where they conflict with the general platform Terms.

That means public marketing language should not be used to erase mission-specific contractual terms.

12–18 months and 10–20 hours/week are typical patterns, not guarantees

A.Team's current Join page says most missions run 12–18 months and many builders work 10–20 hours/week or full time. It also discusses the possibility of multiple missions. We treat these as provider-reported typical patterns—not guaranteed mission duration, guaranteed minimum weekly hours, or guaranteed access to multiple simultaneous missions.

Relationship restrictions matter

Current A.Team Terms include a 24-month non-circumvention period for A.Team-originated Builder/Client relationships and require payments for those relationships to stay through the platform unless an authorized arrangement removes the restriction.

The Terms also describe a separate Network Fee mechanism that can remove the restriction for a relationship, including a formula based on the greater of $20,000 or three times anticipated monthly Builder compensation, plus 10% of certain signing bonuses. We do not describe that as an ordinary on-platform freelancer commission.

Which one fits?

Pick SolidGigs when…

You want broader opportunity discovery across freelance categories and prefer to manage downstream client relationships yourself.

Pick A.Team when…

You are a senior technical or product builder, are willing to pass selective vetting, and prefer a private mission network plus platform-managed commercial administration.

Important limitations

Evidence checked

AlreadyChecked verdict: No universal winner. SolidGigs fits fixed-cost external opportunity discovery and downstream independence; A.Team fits senior technical/product builders who pass selective vetting and prefer private-network missions plus platform commercial administration.

Read the full SolidGigs research →